Boston, Massachusetts – The American Revolution, often romanticized as a struggle against economic oppression, was fundamentally driven by deeply held principles of self-governance, according to historical perspectives. Contrary to popular belief, Continental soldiers were generally better nourished and taller than their British counterparts, indicating that the rebellion was not born out of widespread poverty or hunger.During the conflict, British soldiers were frequently derided by colonists as "lobsters" or "bloody backs," a reference to their distinctive red coats. While "redcoat" was a common descriptor, the more pejorative "lobster" highlighted the bright scarlet uniform, often with white trim, which was a stark contrast to the less uniform attire of the American forces. The term "lobsterbacks" emerged later and is considered less historically accurate for the period.Research into the physical stature of soldiers from the era reveals a notable difference. American Continental soldiers were, on average, taller than British soldiers. This disparity is largely attributed to better nutritional standards in the American colonies, where abundant wild game and agricultural resources contributed to a more protein-rich diet compared to the often more constrained diets in Great Britain. This suggests that the motivations for the Revolution were not primarily rooted in a desperate fight for sustenance.The core of the American Revolution lay in a commitment to philosophical ideals of liberty and self-determination. Colonists protested against perceived infringements on their rights, such as "taxation without representation," and sought to establish a government based on popular sovereignty rather than monarchical rule. The grievances extended beyond mere financial burdens to encompass fundamental questions of political autonomy and individual freedoms. This emphasis on principles over economic hardship underscores the ideological depth of the American quest for independence.