SACRAMENTO, California – Susan Shelley, a prominent columnist and Vice President of Communications for the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, recently asserted that "In California, corruption is legal as long as the forms are filled out correctly." This statement, shared on social media, encapsulates her long-standing critique of the state's political and financial landscape, suggesting that existing legal frameworks may facilitate practices she views as ethically questionable despite being technically compliant.
Shelley frequently highlights what she terms a "pay-to-play culture" within California politics. According to her commentary, campaign donations from unions, regulated entities, and businesses often precede favorable policies or contracts. She points to instances where, even with significant public funds allocated through bond measures, the outcomes for taxpayers are often suboptimal due to inefficiencies and misaligned priorities.
Her criticisms extend to major state initiatives, such as Proposition 1, a mental health bond. Shelley has voiced concerns that funds intended for treatment are diverted to housing projects for drug users without mandatory sobriety, leading to high costs and a perceived lack of accountability. She argues that "the problem isn't the bonds... The problem is the priorities of the people spending the money and, and how efficiently they spend the money."
Shelley also cites the complexity of California's laws, including the Political Reform Act, which she suggests can lead to disproportionate penalties for some while allowing others to exploit loopholes. She has specifically mentioned cases like Shangri-La Industries, a company that received substantial contracts for homeless housing projects, some of which allegedly never materialized, amidst accusations of embezzlement. Such incidents, she contends, underscore the systemic issues that allow for what she describes as "legal corruption."
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, where Shelley holds a leadership position, consistently advocates for greater fiscal accountability and transparency in state government. Her public statements and columns often urge voters to scrutinize bond measures and tax increases, emphasizing the need for effective oversight and a re-evaluation of how public funds are managed and allocated in California.