A recent tweet by Syd Steyerhart on August 19, 2025, alleged that California Governor Gavin Newsom was "retweeting groypers," suggesting potential negative repercussions. However, comprehensive web searches conducted to verify this claim found no evidence of Governor Newsom directly retweeting or endorsing content from the "Groypers" or their leader, Nick Fuentes. Instead, Newsom's recent social media activity has been primarily characterized by a combative stance against former President Donald Trump.
The "Groypers" are identified as a white nationalist, alt-right group led by Nick Fuentes, known for promoting antisemitic, homophobic, and nativist ideologies. This movement aims to inject far-right politics into mainstream conservatism, often by disrupting events and using provocative online tactics. Their followers, sometimes called the "Groyper Army," are distinct from mainstream conservative figures.
Governor Newsom's recent online engagement, particularly on X (formerly Twitter), has focused on directly challenging Donald Trump. His posts frequently employ all-caps and parody, mirroring Trump's own social media style. This strategy is part of Newsom's broader effort to counter Trump's influence, specifically regarding redistricting and immigration policies.
While figures like Nick Fuentes have claimed a "victory" when mainstream conservative influencers adopt rhetoric aligned with Groyper views, this does not indicate an endorsement from Governor Newsom. Newsom has consistently opposed Trump's policies, including the deployment of National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles for immigration crackdowns. His public statements and actions, such as his "Liberation Day" initiative against gerrymandering, directly contradict the nativist and anti-immigrant stances espoused by the Groyper movement.
The tweet's assertion appears to diverge significantly from Governor Newsom's documented public and social media engagements. His administration remains focused on legislative and political maneuvers to counteract federal actions, particularly those initiated by the Trump administration. The claim highlights the ongoing scrutiny of political figures' online interactions and the spread of unverified information.