US Official Reportedly Flags Netanyahu's Commitment to Trump's Gaza Peace Plan

An anonymous senior Washington official has reportedly expressed concerns that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may not fully support President Donald Trump's recently unveiled Gaza peace plan, a development that could disrupt a major US foreign policy initiative. The report suggests potential friction between the two leaders, despite Netanyahu's public endorsement of the plan. Political scientist Max Abrahms highlighted a particular segment of the "America First" movement's reaction to this potential discord.

President Trump introduced a 20-point peace proposal for Gaza on September 29, 2025, during a joint appearance with Prime Minister Netanyahu at the White House. The plan outlines conditions for a ceasefire, hostage releases, and a conditional pathway to Palestinian self-determination, while demanding Hamas's disarmament and exclusion from future governance. Netanyahu publicly affirmed his support for the plan, stating it achieves Israel's war aims.

However, the unnamed Washington official reportedly voiced worries that Netanyahu's commitment might waver on elements less popular with his right-wing political base. This concern aligns with past instances where the Trump administration has reportedly expressed frustration over Israeli actions. Earlier this year, Trump himself publicly stated, "I will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank. It’s not going to happen… It’s time to stop now," indicating potential points of divergence.

Commenting on these reported concerns, Max Abrahms observed a specific political reaction:

"Many 'America First' guys hate Israel more than they like America... the self-described America First guys were elated that Trump and Netanyahu could potentially clash over a botched peace plan. Yes, they prefer clashes with Israel to American success," Abrahms stated in his social media post.

This perspective within the "America First" movement, often characterized by a non-interventionist or skeptical stance on foreign entanglements, appears to view any perceived friction with allies as a validation of their approach. The reported official's warning and Abrahms's commentary underscore the intricate dynamics within US foreign policy and the ongoing challenges in achieving a comprehensive Middle East peace.