Wesley Yang Argues Women's Rights Depend on Excluding Men from 'Woman' Category

Prominent essayist and podcaster Wesley Yang has asserted that the legal status and rights of women are fundamentally contingent upon the exclusion of men, including those who identify as women, from the definition of "woman." In a recent social media post, Yang characterized any claims suggesting otherwise as a "con job," emphasizing a strict biological interpretation of sex.

"Women should recognize that any and all claims that their rights and legal status depend on the recognition of any man who says he is a woman as a woman are a con job," Yang stated in his tweet. He further elaborated, "In fact, their rights and legal status depend on the exclusion of any man from the category of woman, including -- especially -- those who claim to be women." This position aligns with a broader gender-critical viewpoint that prioritizes sex-based rights.

Yang has consistently voiced concerns regarding the societal acceptance of gender identity over biological sex, particularly in areas like sports, changing rooms, and prisons. He has questioned the implications of gender identity dogma, suggesting it can lead to scenarios where the safety and rights of women are compromised. His arguments often highlight potential conflicts between gender identity policies and established protections for biological women.

The essayist is known for his critical analysis of what he terms "successor ideology" and its impact on various social issues, including gender politics. His work frequently explores the rapid integration of radical gender politics into law, medicine, and daily life, often through his Substack "Year Zero" and various podcast appearances. Yang's perspective contributes to an ongoing public discourse about the definition of sex and gender and their respective roles in legal and social frameworks.