X's Content Moderation Policies Spark Ongoing Free Speech Debate Three Years Post-Acquisition

The platform formerly known as Twitter, now X, continues to be a focal point in discussions surrounding free speech and content moderation, nearly three years after Elon Musk's acquisition. A recent social media post by Robert Sterling highlighted this shift, stating, > "Three years ago, you would have gotten suspended for posting this on Twitter. Like him or not, Elon really did save free speech." This sentiment reflects the significant policy changes implemented under Musk's ownership, which have aimed to prioritize broader expression.

Since acquiring the platform in October 2022, Elon Musk has consistently articulated a commitment to "free speech absolutism," leading to a notable overhaul of content moderation guidelines. This shift involved the reinstatement of numerous previously banned accounts, including high-profile figures, and a stated move away from what Musk termed "woke mind virus" censorship. The platform's approach now emphasizes legality over broad content restrictions, focusing on removing content that is illegal rather than merely offensive.

These policy adjustments have elicited varied reactions from users, advertisers, and civil liberties organizations. Supporters argue that the changes have fostered a more open environment for diverse viewpoints, aligning with the platform's role as a global public square. Conversely, critics express concerns that the relaxed moderation has led to a proliferation of misinformation, hate speech, and harmful content, potentially making the platform less safe for users and less appealing to advertisers.

Reports from various organizations indicate a complex landscape, with some studies suggesting an increase in certain types of problematic content, while others point to a broader range of discussions. X's revenue has faced challenges, partly attributed to advertiser apprehension regarding brand safety on the platform amidst these content policy changes. The debate over balancing free expression with user safety remains central to X's operational strategy and public perception.